AnonymousUnsigned | Chapter : 49 | Date : 01/08/08
I thought that your original thought-experiment/plot set-up was pretty fantastic. For the first say, 15 chapters, I really enjoyed how you used the characters of Daniel and Harry to explore several interesting themes. For example, the way that you recreated Harry's Dursley experience within a surviving genetic family was fascinating. Throughout the canon, it is generally assumed that Harry would have lead a completely normal and (therefore) idyllic life if his parents had lived. I really liked how your story engaged that assumption.
Another theme that interested me was in how you used Harry (again, especially at the beginning) as a metaphorical stand-in for all of the unacknowledged help that the canon Harry (Daniel in your story) receives. Usually, this help takes the form of Hermione, which I thought you cleverly alluded to by making Harry a Ravenclaw ace student. Your exploration of Harry and Daniel's ties to Voldemort (ie, how Daniel was mistaken for the Boy Who Lived) also tied Harry to another unacknowledged, sometimes by Rowling, helper in Neville.
Unfortunately, the extremely promising set-up you give us in the first few chapters winds up a bit lost in the wind as your story progresses. My main gripe with your story was characterization. I understand the need for much of the wizarding populace to be extremely antagonistic toward Harry. I especially liked the negative correlation you draw between James-Sirius and Daniel-Ron. But why the unerringly negative portrayal of Dumbledore? In canon, Dumbledore is shown several times as willing to admit to past mistakes. And I felt that Harry should have been a little more forgiving of people after his explosion at the Potter house. After all, wasn't the point to let loose all of the pent-up aggravation he had experienced for 17 years?
Another, smaller, problem was simple storytelling. I was massively confused about how Hermione went from missing the train to lying in Daniel's lap. Similarly, how did Harry not die in the duel with Voldemort? Was he simply faking? And what were those Hermione-Dumbledore meetings actually about? In the end, Daniel says that he was told he would end up with Hermione. Why would he be promised to a muggle-born of no astonishing beauty and whom he hardly knew, and whom his parents did not know at all?
This brings me to my final, and greatest, disappointment with your story which is how you handled the romantic aspects at the end. In canon, the reason I ship H/Hr is because of the deep and meaningful friendship that they share, the powerful shared experiences, the ease they have in each other's presence, the slight whispers in Books 3&4, more overt and tantalizing hints coming forth in Book 5. In your story, however, this girl for Harry is Luna. Hermione from the outset is characterized as a girl Harry notices for the first time as strikingly pretty, and then he goes out with her. They never develop any kind of friendship upon which to build a more serious relationship. Hell, their conversation almost never ventures from stock couples-talk. Kind of like Ginny in Book 6. Which brings me to Luna. I thought that your Luna was a shining beacon at the end of the story. Simply put, you wrote one of the best Lunas I have ever read. The scene in the final chapter where she tells Harry of her love---heart wrenching. I was tempted to stop reading there.
Despite the negatives, I really did find this story enjoyable. In addition to a brilliant starting point, you wrote exciting action scenes that really carried me through to the end of the story. I also liked what you did with Harry's animagus, and how parseltongue became a focus of the story instead of simply a cool little footnote like it is in canon. |